US District Court Approves Split of Settlement Funds between CMS and TriCare


The present action, Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Dep’t of the Navy Med. Care Recovery Unit, arises out of a motor vehicle accident where June Shaw, an occupant of the vehicle was severely injured when Cecil Shaw had a medical event that led to the accident. Ms. Shaw was both a Medicare and TriCare beneficiary.

As a beneficiary of both entities, Ms. Shaw was entitled to treatment on the condition that Medicare and TriCare would be reimbursed after settlement for payment of accident-related treatment. After settlement, the $100,000 policy limit proceeds were paid to the court for safekeeping and Geico, the plaintiff in this case and Mr. Shaw’s insurance carrier, filed an interpleader to allow third parties to claim their interest in the settlement proceeds from Ms. Shaw’s accident.

Both Medicare and the Department of the Navy, Medical Care Recovery Unit answered the interpleader and sought statutory reimbursement for funds paid on behalf of Ms. Shaw. The court determined that both parties had undisputed liens for treatment paid on Ms. Shaw’s behalf and that Medicare’s lien alone exceeded the policy limits. As a result, Medicare and Navy came to an agreement to split the settlement proceeds on a pro rata basis with Medicare taking 93% of the proceeds and Navy the remaining 7%.

The court determined that both CMS and Navy have statutory rights to reimbursement from the interpleaded funds and approved the parties’ agreement regarding the splitting of the proceeds.

#USDistrictCourt #CMS #Medicare

Recent Posts

© 2020 Carr Allison Medicare Compliance Group

100 Vestavia Parkway

Birmingham, AL 35216

P: 205.949.2949

F: 205.822.2057

E: mzwilling@carrallison.com

FOLLOW US:

  • LinkedIn - White Circle
  • Twitter - White Circle

 

Required statement from the AL State Bar:  No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services provided by other lawyers.  Any recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors.  Disclaimer.