New York State Appeals Court Holds Dissatisfaction with Effect of MSA Not Grounds to Void Settlement

Plaintiffs, John Lenge and his wife, filed suit after John allegedly sustained an injury at work. On the first day of trial, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement was memorialized on-the-record in open court. As part of the terms of the settlement, Plaintiffs’ counsel and the Plaintiffs acknowledged the possibility of establishing a Medicare Set-aside as part of the settlement. Plaintiffs also agreed to pay any Medicare liens that may have existed. Later, Plaintiffs moved to nullify the settlement. The court upheld the settlement as binding, stating “[t]he fact that the plaintiffs are unsatisfied with the amount they will receive after payment of the workers’ compensation lien and the establishment of a Medicare Set-aside does not constitute a sufficient ground to invalidate the settlement.”

Recent Posts

© 2020 Carr Allison Medicare Compliance Group

100 Vestavia Parkway

Birmingham, AL 35216

P: 205.949.2949

F: 205.822.2057



  • LinkedIn - White Circle
  • Twitter - White Circle


Required statement from the AL State Bar:  No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services provided by other lawyers.  Any recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors.  Disclaimer.